London’s tube map
If you want to see the current London tube map, visit this page on the Transport for London site.
I set this page up in response to the BBC making a radio/blog item on whether the current design of London’s tube map is a lot less ‘classic’ than it used to be:
November 2007: A classic that has lost its way
This is the version of the London tube map that was introduced in November 2007:
The reason for this new map is the addition of some lines that are new to the tube system: the London Overground from Euston to Watford, Gospel Oak to Barking and Willesden to Clapham.
I think that this supposed ‘design classic’ has lost its way in the last twenty years. Some rules remain despite the reason for their introduction having long-since become out of date. One of these is making the map work when people photocopy the map and all colour is lost. As colour prints now seem more convenient and cheaper than photocopies, the rule that map must work in black and white can be dropped.
In the tradition of amateur contributions to the design evolution of the map, here’s my version of the map. I think that older versions of this map reflected an artistic aesthetic as well as the need to provide useful information. I think my version is clearer and looks better:
For a very large version, click.
I’ve incorporated some future transport plans to make this the map for 2012 system for two reasons: firstly to show how they fit into the design, secondly to show TfL that I’m not passing this off as an official design for the system as it is.
Information design: I believe that prior to the 1990s the design of the map helped people oriented themselves by noting whether they were to the left or the right of a straight Northern, and above or below the Central. Under the section of changes to make routes clearer: to show where there Jubilee went, I thought best make it straight towards Canary Wharf; to help people choose The Waterloo and City outside the peaks, best make it straight. I also wanted to make the DLR clearer (and better looking!)
It’s best to indicate on the lines themselves those that do not run full time. I’ve added a dashed white line to these services. I’ve also marked stations with limited opening hours with a hollow tick mark which should prompt people to look at the key for further information. I think the traditional dagger symbol could be overlooked by many.
I also fixed some geographical anomalies where possible: the relative alignment of the Victoria and Overground line, the proximity of Regents Park and Great Portland Street station and the relative positions of the two Edgware Road stations.
Aesthetics: I liked it when Epping and West Ruislip reflected each other. I liked it when the eastern District was straight. I also wanted to make the central area (Bond Street to Holborn) to be more geometrical. I also used a lighter weight type for the Overground line stations.
The trick is to have all this content while making the map look as clear and beautiful as the 1970s version:
![]()
Click to enlarge
(from The London Tube Map Archive)
For much more on the evolution of the map, visit the official site for a book on the design of the map since the 1960s.
December 2007: A suggestion from Paris
As the London tube system will only get more complicated, maybe it is time to consider using an idea from the Paris Metro: make more of names of the terminii of each line. I think that one of the biggest problems for new users of the system is the use of compass-point directions (’Eastbound and Westbound’) at tube stations.
Sometimes I need to change at Westminster. When I do, I see that the Jubilee platforms are labelled as being for trains going ‘Westbound’ and ‘Eastbound’. Surely from the point of view of most Londoners, certainly for those who navigate by the tube map, the Jubilee line goes north-south at that point, and the sub-surface lines east-west. The District and Circle aren’t marked as going Northbound and Southbound at Westminster (which are the directions it travels at that station).
Both the Jubilee and Bakerloo lines leave Baker Street to the east. Their platforms aren’t described as Eastbound.
Signage could look like this:

With a revised (2012) tube map looking like this:
Thames Gateway excursions
Various extensions to the DLR are planned.
One that has a serious chance of success is one from Beckton to Dagenham Dock. That might be co-ordinated with an extension of the Overground to the same station:
There was talk of an extension to Charing Cross station. That would revive the original Fleet Line plan that connected Charing Cross with Thamesmead. There are some disused Jubilee Line tunnels between Green Park and Aldwych, so why not connect the DLR with Green Park too:
With these extensions maybe it will make more sense to rename the DLR to the Thames Gateway Railway…
London Overground logo
Transport for London have come up with a plain logo for London Overground. Some say this is because they want to have a ’soft launch’ - there’s no point in getting Londoners excited when nothing much has changed. Maybe the branding could be stronger once the new trains and improved service arrives. The logo could match the shape of the network:

Quicker by foot?
One of the disadvantages of Beck’s diagrammatic system is that people may not realise how close some stations are from each other. Here’s a new rule for the map that shows distance in metres between stations - when on the same line and when on different lines:
The hardest part of the map to show this with is for Bayswater and Queensway:

The new Outer Circle
Over 100 years ago, the private companies that built the early London Underground planned an ‘Outer Circle’ line to go with the Inner Circle - the line we call the Circle Line.
As Transport for London have taken control of some surface lines and plan to extend the East London Line to reach the former North London Line, the prospect of an outer circle is looking more positive.
To match my tube map design, I’ve used light type for non-underground stations.
December 2007: Future tube map with accessibility information and river services
Posted 17 December 2007
This is my current design for the future tube map. As accessibility information must be included on the map (for political reasons), I’ve come up with light blue markers for interchanges and station ticks. This means that the disability logos no longer overpower the map.
Many think it would be useful to show distances between stations that are physically close but are not connected directly. The new official map is starting to to this, my solution is different. I’ve also shown more links than the current map does.
I’ve found a reason for Beck’s inclusion of the Thames on map - river services are now included on the map - not a serious suggestion.
I’ve also shown the proposed service changes for the Circle and Northern lines. I’ve called the new separated service “Edgington” in the tradition of the Bakerloo.


23 November, 2007 at 6:50 pm
[...] Connections I’ve added some posts on connections and extensions to my page on London’s tube map. [...]
28 November, 2007 at 10:46 am
I really don’t like the idea of working with terminals as destinations. East/West/North/Southbound seems much more clear to me, and I wish the Circle would work with Clock and Anti-Clockwise. In Paris I just got incredibly confused because I had to know exactly what the last station on that line was, which meant that I had to look at a map every time. In London you only need to know in which general direction you’re going.
And in London it is quite common for trains to turn back early, for example at Arnos Grove or Tower Hill. If as a tourist I’m getting on a District towards Upminster and the train doesn’t actually go to Upminster I’d get even more confused.
I like the other things you’ve done here, though. Good work! Do you think there’s a way of making Stratford International - Stratford look a bit more stylish?
6 December, 2007 at 12:38 am
[...] has lost its way To all those who are following a link to my redesigned tube map, please click one more time to see the original post and more on the London Tube Map. The comments below apply to the map shown on that [...]
15 December, 2007 at 10:06 pm
I really like the London Overground Roundel you created! I can really see it working in sync with the 2012 Olympic Games Logo!
George
16 December, 2007 at 10:36 pm
I really love your new tube map and it certainly harks back to the versions from the late 70s. How would you incorporate the circle line into your destenation ideas? I especially like the way you did the DLR at the east.
This is my plan for getting rid of the whole London Overground thing and disembowling it into Cross London, South East, Outer Circle, North Easten and an extension to the Central Line.
Obviously its pie in the sky because of the technical difficulties, the idea of turning it into an outer circle really appealed to me.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x209/gingerblokey3/london2.jpg
18 December, 2007 at 7:15 pm
Sorry to post twice but I saw your new map.
It seems to me youve gone completely off track, you have the right idea; to make it into a design icon again but it seems youve gone a bit wrong. Its so much more confusing than when you started. The ticks look odd and the river-boat idea is good but it makes it look clustered.
Youve gone the same way as TfL by trying to show too much, scrap everything that’s not nessercary and just have the tube lines and stations. Disabled information and London Overground are totally uneeded in my opinion.
The original tube map by Harry Beck took something confusing and turned it into something simple and since about 1999 TfL or whatever they were called have taken something simple and turned it into one hell of a confusing mess.
Just a little montage to prove my point.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x209/gingerblokey3/simplicityq.jpg
Hope that came across as constructive criticism and not just me being nasty. Sorry if it did.
18 December, 2007 at 10:55 pm
I think that including step-free access is a bad idea, yet if including it makes my map more likely to be accepted by the client (Transport for London), I might as well find a better way of doing it than the current version. I’d rather not include the Overground, zonal information, station opening times, airport interchange logos everywhere etc. etc. But as these are required, my task is to make my version better than the other maps with the same information. My job isn’t to decide what to include, it is to make it work.
19 December, 2007 at 2:03 pm
Oh yes, I definetly agree, and it that sense then obviously you’ve done a really good job. I think TfL is just ludicrous for trying to get all of that information onto a map the size of an A5 (I think) bit of paper for quick reference. Fair enough the big maps outside stations should include this information but the smaller booklet ones should be simple and easy to understand, TfL already make a huge large print version (which I have on my wall) which includes the disabled information.
28 December, 2007 at 12:58 am
surely if the northern line was split the charing cross branch would go to high barnet because they switch sides after euston??
i was wondering if you exprimented with extending the bakerloo line down to bromley and the northern down to croydon which have been mooted, and crossrail and chelney
and how do you all these, what software program, because i would love to have a go at doing my own may with my ideas, for lines and how to convey information??
29 December, 2007 at 12:22 am
This map is a good idea, i do not like the splitting of the northern line.
29 December, 2007 at 1:31 am
The changes planned for the Northern and Circle lines that I’ve shown are the current plans for changes in service. They’re designed to provide more frequent and reliable services.
6 January, 2008 at 12:29 am
i know that it is planned to split the northern line, but if you look at the way camden junction is built the trains from charing cross approach camden town on the east side, so would have to go accross the junction to get to the edgeware platforms, you have got the branches going to completely wrong places, the point of the split is to eliminate camden junction.
also thanks for answering my earlier question… i asked you what program you use or how you do it, because i want to have a go, hopefully i’ll get the courtesy of an answer this time!
6 January, 2008 at 9:31 am
I really like your new futuristic tube map. I’ve heard that by 2011, the circle line will lose its complete circle and become a spiral line, but it’ll still be called the circle line, but it’ll start at hammersmith up until Paddington to do a complete circle, then terminating at edgware road. I’ve drawn my own London Underground line called the Brentmead line, it’ll be the only line on the whole Underground to breach the M25 twice! The line will start at Brentwood to Redhill via Upminster, Dagenham stations, Thamesmead stations, Fenchurch Street, Aldwcyh, St Pancras International, Paddington, Kensington and Peckham. There is also a branch on the line that’ll branch off from Fenchurch Street onwards to Gordan Hill via Whitechapel, Walthamstow marshes etc.. (I’ve forgotten some of the other stations.) Plus at peak times theres another branch to Enfeild town with no intermediate stations. Trains can also terminate at Upminster, Fenchurch street and Paddington.
10 March, 2008 at 9:36 pm
Hi, I’d like to ask if your concepts regarding the future maps of LU can be licensed through Creative Commons to a 3rd party. I’m very interested in your ideas and would like to apply it on the future maps of Hong Kong’s underground railway system, which will be part of my virtual railway project. I’m not sure if I’ll make it for BVE or MSTS2 though, anyway it will base on my suggestion on improving the railway system of HK and the government’s proposal on the future railway network.
Cheers~~^^
26 March, 2008 at 4:02 pm
I think your December 2007: Future tube map with accessibility information and river services is the best, it is clear and still easy to use and that the Northern line is now two differnt lines as this is what TfL wants by 2025. The horrible accessibility have been replaced with a very cleaver idea, i really do belivbe that TfL should use that map, and its still looks ‘classic’. Also the London Overground logo is very good i thought it was also very cleaver and abit more exciting and it would break awa from the rest of the roundals. How did you create the maps in the first place? Email me, i would like to know
15 April, 2008 at 8:20 am
Please remove any reference to FWT being involved in the present Underground map. This is WRONG. We have had no involvement in published Underground maps since the 1980s. Please publish an apology on your site. I do not want to be associated with the present map.
15 April, 2008 at 8:47 am
Good stuff. Your maps are largely clearer than LU’s current editions.
A couple of thoughts, though. While you’re splitting lines: I’ve never understood why the Wimbledon-Edgward Road service is treated as a part of the District, when it avoids the Earl’s Court-Tower Hill core and is run as part of the Circle/H&C. For a long time it was known on usenet as the Wimbleware service - perhaps you could split this one off, Edgington style?
In the same way, I suspect that, once the ELLX is complete, London Overground is going to be a bit unwieldy to show as a single line/network. Perhaps this could be split into different routes too.
Lastly, in terms of walking connections, Camden Road/Camden Town are only a few minutes apart. For some reason TfL seems reluctant to admit this…
15 April, 2008 at 9:31 am
Mr. Rose, I agree that you should not want to be associated with the current map. An assertion that only an evil person would dare make. Sadly, in this case your mention of FWT is the first on this page. That mention was the second.
I think young Smithers should quickly review Underground Maps After Beck by Maxwell J. Roberts. If he reads that he will see that it is those who set the political rules about the map’s design that are to blame.
15 April, 2008 at 9:34 am
Jonn, I agree that Wimbleware should be a different line, except I have vague memories of being on a District Line platform at Blackfriars which has listed an immanent arrival by a train going to Wimbledon. The divisions between lines that I show on the December 2007 map are ones currently planned by Transport for London.
15 April, 2008 at 9:52 am
Trains do run from Wimbledon to Upminster. My point was that the ones that run Wimbledon to Edgward Road are, in effect, a completely different line to those that run Upminster to Richmond: they use different trains, are run as different routes, are shown on different internal carriage maps, and their only point of contact is using adjacent platforms at Earl’s Court. I’ve never understood why LUL persists with this odd belief that they’re the same line.
I just figured, while you’re doing such a good job of fixing their other mistakes…
30 April, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Fascinating stuff. I’ve seen the book that shows how the map has changed over the years. I personally prefer the very original one where the routes are aligned more with the actual overground streets so are very curvy rather than the straight lines they use now. As someone who visits London by coach nowadays, I walk most places and the distances on tube maps are completely misleading in every respect. When I used to live in London I used to think how useful it would be to have an outer ring road loop of tubes. To have to go in and then turn and come back out again on another line was very time consuming.
1 July, 2008 at 8:52 pm
None of us can make any headway against map apathy unless we combine together. A bunch of disparate map enthusiasts spouting forth on the internet isn’t going to convert the politicians Alex suggests control the tube map. The map designer can stand up for his art, if there is the support from a credible lobby.
Does the new Gollner Overground map pay homage to the Circle line car card?